Drug Retention Rate and Causes of Discontinuation of Adalimumab in Uveitis Real-World Data from the Biotherapies in Uveitis (BioUvea) Study Group


Por: Llorenç V, Cordero-Coma M, Blanco-Esteban A, Heras-Mulero H, Losada-Castillo MJ, Jovani M, Valls-Pascual E, Jodar-Marquez M, García-Aparicio Á, Fonollosa A, González-Guijarro JJ, Rodriguez-Melian L, Fernández-Prada M, Jerez-Fidalgo M, Hernandez-Garfella M, Esquinas C, Sainz-de-la-Maza M and Adán A

Publicada: 1 jun 2020 Ahead of Print: 2 dic 2019
Categoría: Ophthalmology

Resumen:
Purpose: To study the drug retention rate (DRR), causes, and predictors of discontinuation of adalimumab (ADA) in a real-world uveitis setting. Design: Multicentric, nationwide, registry-based, ambispective, observational study. Participants: Patients treated with ADA for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) in the Biotherapies for Uveitis (BioUvea) Spanish registry from November 2016 to November 2017. Methods: Demographics, clinical data, timing, and reasons for discontinuation, if occurred, were recorded. The DRRand drug retention time (DRT) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was analyzed by reverse Kaplan-Meier. Log-rank test was used for comparisons. Cox proportional-hazards model (PHM) and propensity score matching were used to identify predictors for discontinuation due to inefficacy and adverse events. Main Outcome Measures: Drug retention rate and DRT. Results: A total of 392 patients were analyzed, including 218 women. Median age was 39 (interquartile range, 25) years. Nonanterior uveitis was recorded in 242 patients. Median follow-up was 49.07 (0.97-131.67) months, median DRT (survival) was 69.3 months, and 14 patients were lost to follow-up. The DRR at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months was 92.97%, 87.68%, 76.31%, and 54.28%, respectively. Adalimumab was discontinued in 151 patients. Discontinuation was due to lack or loss of efficacy in 74 patients, adverse event in 34 patients, and sustained quiescence in 25 patients. Recorded adverse events included infections in 10 patients and malignant neoplasms in 3 patients. Concurrent classic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) was given to 251 patients. We did not find DRT differences regarding the use of concurrent IMT. Adalimumab was prescribed as a second or greater biotherapy line in 76 patients who showed shorter DRT (P = 0.038). Starting ADA in nonbiotherapy-naive patients was a predictor for "discontinuation due to inefficacy," whereas undifferentiated uveitis was a predictor for "discontinuation due to adverse event." Drug retention time was significantly shorter when spared or intensified, mainly due to discontinuation after sustained quiescence. Conclusions: Drug retention rate of ADA in uveitis at 60 months was 54.28%, with a good safety profile. The use of concurrent IMT did not show a significant influence on DRT. The use of ADA as a second or further biotherapy could be predictive for discontinuation due to inefficacy. Undifferentiated uveitis may be prone to premature discontinuation of ADA due to adverse events. (C) 2019 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

Filiaciones:
Llorenç V:
 Clínic Institute of Ophthalmology (ICOF), Clínic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Cordero-Coma M:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de León, León, Spain

Blanco-Esteban A:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario de Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain

Heras-Mulero H:
 Ophthalmology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Losada-Castillo MJ:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain

Jovani M:
 Rheumatology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain

:
 Rheumatology Department, Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain

Jodar-Marquez M:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Regional de Málaga, Málaga, Spain

García-Aparicio Á:
 Rheumatology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain

Fonollosa A:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain

González-Guijarro JJ:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain

Rodriguez-Melian L:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain

Fernández-Prada M:
 Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain

Jerez-Fidalgo M:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Perpetuo Socorro, Badajoz, Spain

Hernandez-Garfella M:
 Ophthalmology Department, Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Esquinas C:
 Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Sainz-de-la-Maza M:
 Clínic Institute of Ophthalmology (ICOF), Clínic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Adán A:
 Clínic Institute of Ophthalmology (ICOF), Clínic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
ISSN: 01616420





OPHTHALMOLOGY
Editorial
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, United States, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 127 Número: 6
Páginas: 814-825
WOS Id: 000553874500017
ID de PubMed: 31952883
imagen Bronze

MÉTRICAS