Finding the Best Thresholds of FEV1 and Dyspnea to Predict 5-Year Survival in COPD Patients: The COCOMICS Study


Por: Almagro P, Martinez-Camblor P, Soriano JB, Marin JM, Alfageme I, Casanova C, Esteban C, Soler-Cataluña JJ, de-Torres JP, Celli BR and Miravitlles M

Publicada: 27 feb 2014
Resumen:
Background: FEV1 is universally used as a measure of severity in COPD. Current thresholds are based on expert opinion and not on evidence. Objectives: We aimed to identify the best FEV1 (% predicted) and dyspnea (mMRC) thresholds to predict 5-yr survival in COPD patients. Design and Methods: We conducted a patient-based pooled analysis of eleven COPD Spanish cohorts (COCOMICS). Survival analysis, ROC curves, and C-statistics were used to identify and compare the best FEV1 (%) and mMRC scale thresholds that predict 5-yr survival. Results: A total of 3,633 patients (93% men), totaling 15,878 person-yrs. were included, with a mean age 66.469.7, and predicted FEV1 of 53.8% (+/- 19.4%). Overall 975 (28.1%) patients died at 5 years. The best thresholds that spirometrically split the COPD population were: mild >= 70%, moderate 56-69%, severe 36-55%, and very severe <= 35%. Survival at 5 years was 0.89 for patients with FEV1 >= 70 vs. 0.46 in patients with FEV1 <= 35% (H. R: 6; 95% C. I.: 4.69-7.74). The new classification predicts mortality significantly better than dyspnea (mMRC) or FEV1 GOLD and BODE cutoffs (all p<0.001). Prognostic reliability is maintained at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years. In younger patients, survival was similar for FEV1 (%) values between 70% and 100%, whereas in the elderly the relationship between FEV1 (%) and mortality was inversely linear. Conclusions: The best thresholds for 5-yr survival were obtained stratifying FEV1 (%) by >= 70%, 56-69%, 36-55%, and <= 35%. These cutoffs significantly better predict mortality than mMRC or FEV1 (%) GOLD and BODE cutoffs.

Filiaciones:
Almagro P:
 Acute Geriatric Care Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

Martinez-Camblor P:
 Asturias Biomedical Research Office, Asturias, Oviedo, Spain

Soriano JB:
 Fundacio de Investigacio Sanitaria de les Illes Balears, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Balearic Islands, Spain

Marin JM:
 Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain

Alfageme I:
 Respiratory Department, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain

Casanova C:
 Respiratory Department, Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain

Esteban C:
 Respiratory Department, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain

:
 Respiratory Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova,Valencia, Spain

de-Torres JP:
 Respiratory Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Celli BR:
 Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Miravitlles M:
 Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain
ISSN: 19326203





PLoS One
Editorial
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 9 Número: 2
Páginas:
WOS Id: 000332390800050
ID de PubMed: 24587085
imagen Green Published, Green Submitted, gold

FULL TEXT

imagen Published Version CC BY 4.0

MÉTRICAS