Insect Venom Immunotherapy: Analysis of the Safety and Tolerance of 3 Buildup Protocols Frequently Used in Spain


Por: Gutierrez Fernandez D, Moreno-Ancillo A, Fernandez Melendez S, Dominguez-Noche C, Galvez Ruiz P, Alfaya Arias T, Carballada Gonzalez F J, Alonso Llamazares A, Marques Amat L L, Vega Castro A, Antolin Amerigo D, Cruz Granados S, Ruiz Leon B, Sanchez Morillas L, Fernandez F, Soriano V, Borja Segade J M, Dalmau Duch G, Guspi Bori R and Miranda Paez A

Publicada: 1 ene 2016
Resumen:
Introduction: Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment but not one devoid of risk, as both local and systemic adverse reactions may occur, especially in the initial phases. We compared the tolerance to 3 VIT buildup protocols and analyzed risk factors associated with adverse reactions during this phase. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 165 patients divided into 3 groups based on the buildup protocol used (3, 4, and 9 weeks). The severity of systemic reactions was evaluated according to the World Allergy Organization model. Results were analyzed using exploratory descriptive statistics, and variables were compared using analysis of variance. Results: Adverse reactions were recorded in 53 patients (32%) (43 local and 10 systemic). Local reactions were immediate in 27 patients (63%) and delayed in 16 (37%). The severity of the local reaction was slight/moderate in 15 patients and severe in 13. Systemic reactions were grade 1-2. No significant association was found between the treatment modality and the onset of local or systemic adverse reactions or the type of local reaction. We only found a statistically significant association between severity of the local reaction and female gender. As for the risk factors associated with systemic reactions during the buildup phase, we found no significant differences in values depending on the protocol used or the insect responsible. Conclusions: The buildup protocols compared proved to be safe and did not differ significantly from one another. In the population studied, patients undergoing the 9-week schedule presented no systemic reactions. Therefore, this protocol can be considered the safest approach.

Filiaciones:
Gutierrez Fernandez D:
 Servicio Neumologia-Alergia, Hospital Universitario Puerta Mar, Cadiz, Spain

Moreno-Ancillo A:
 Servicio de Alergologia, Hospital Nuestra Senora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Spain

Fernandez Melendez S:
 Servicio de Alergologia, Hospital Regional Carlos Haya, Malaga, Spain

Dominguez-Noche C:
 Servicio Alergologia, Hospital Virgen Puerto, Plasencia, Spain

Galvez Ruiz P:
 Facultad de Educacion, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Spain

Alfaya Arias T:
 Servicio Alergologia, Hospital General Universitario, Ciudad Real, Spain

Carballada Gonzalez F J:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Alonso Llamazares A:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Marques Amat L L:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Vega Castro A:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Antolin Amerigo D:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Cruz Granados S:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Ruiz Leon B:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Sanchez Morillas L:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Fernandez F:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Soriano V:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Borja Segade J M:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Dalmau Duch G:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Guspi Bori R:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC

Miranda Paez A:
 Hymenoptera Allergy Committee of the SEAIC
ISSN: 10189068





JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Editorial
ESMON PUBLICIDAD S A, CALLE BALMES 209, 3 2, BARCELONA, 08006, SPAIN, España
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 26 Número: 6
Páginas: 366-373
WOS Id: 000392166800004
ID de PubMed: 27996943

MÉTRICAS