Dexmedetomidine versus propofol during drug-induced sleep endoscopy and sedation: a systematic review


Por: Chang ET, Certal V, Song SA, Zaghi S, Carrasco-Llatas M, Torre C, Capasso R and Camacho M

Publicada: 1 sep 2017 Ahead of Print: 27 ene 2017
Resumen:
Background The purpose of the present study is to review the international literature, using a systematic review, for studies comparing propofol and dexmedetomidine for drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) or sedation in which there is a description of the effect of the agents on the upper airway and associated variables (e.g., vital signs, sedation scores). Methods This is a systematic review through October 4, 2016. PubMed/MEDLINE and four additional databases were accessed for this study. Results Two hundred twenty studies were screened. 79 were downloaded, and 10 met criteria. The majority of the studies identified dexmedetomidine as the preferred pharmacologic agent for DISE due to an overall safer and more stable profile based upon hemodynamic stability. However, propofol provided greater airway obstruction with oxygen desaturations. With either agent, the degree of obstruction in the upper airway lacks some degree of validity as to whether the obstructions accurately represent natural sleep or are simply a drug induced effect. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine and propofol have their advantages and disadvantages during DISE. Generally, dexmedetomidine was preferred and seemed to provide a more stable profile based upon cardiopulmonary status. However, propofol has a quicker onset, has a shorter half-life, and can demonstrate larger degrees of obstruction, which might more accurately reflect what happens during REM sleep. Additional research is recommended.

Filiaciones:
Chang ET:
 Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Rd, Honolulu, HI, 96859, USA.

Certal V:
 Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Sleep Medicine Centre, Hospital CUF, Porto, Portugal

 CINTESIS Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Song SA:
 Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Rd, Honolulu, HI, 96859, USA

Zaghi S:
 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Division of Sleep Surgery and Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA, USA

:
 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, 46017, Valencia, Spain

Torre C:
 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA

Capasso R:
 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Division of Sleep Surgery and Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA, USA

Camacho M:
 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Division of Sleep Surgery and Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA, USA

 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Sleep Medicine Division, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, CA, USA
ISSN: 15209512





SLEEP AND BREATHING
Editorial
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, Alemania
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 21 Número: 3
Páginas: 727-735
WOS Id: 000411070700020
ID de PubMed: 28130737

MÉTRICAS