Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review
Por:
Guerra-Paiva, S, Lobao, M, Simoes, J, Donato, H, Carrillo, I, Mira, J and Sousa, P
Publicada:
1 ago 2022
Ahead of Print:
4 ago 2022
Categoría:
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Resumen:
Introduction Health organisations should support healthcare workers who are physically and psychologically affected by patient safety incidents (second victims). There is a growing body of evidence which focuses on second victim support interventions. However, there is still limited research on the elements necessary to effectively implement and ensure the sustainability of these types of interventions. In this study, we propose to map and frame the key factors which underlie an effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions in healthcare organisations when healthcare workers are physically and/or emotionally affected by patient safety incidents.
Methods and analysis This scoping review will be guided by the established methodological Arksey and O'Malley framework, Levac and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations. We will follow the JBI three-step process: (1) a preliminary search conducted on two databases; (2) the definition of clear inclusion criteria and the creation of a list of search terms to be used in the subsequent running of the search on a larger number of databases; and (3) additional searches (cross-checking/cross-referencing of reference lists of eligible studies, hand-searching in target journals relevant to the topic, conference proceedings, institutional/organisational websites and networks repositories). We will undertake a comprehensive search strategy in relevant bibliographic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, Epistemonikos, Scielo, Cochrane Library and Open Grey). We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool V.2018 for quality assessment of the eligible studies. Our scoping review will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews.
Ethics and dissemination This study will not require ethical approval. Results of the scoping review will be published in a peer-review journal, and findings will be presented in scientific conferences as well as in international forums and other relevant dissemination channels.
Filiaciones:
Guerra-Paiva, S:
NOVA Univ Lisbon, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
CHRC, Comprehens Hlth Res Ctr, Lisbon, Portugal
NOVA Univ Lisbon, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, Lisbon, Portugal
Lobao, M:
NOVA Univ Lisbon, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
CHRC, Comprehens Hlth Res Ctr, Lisbon, Portugal
NOVA Univ Lisbon, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, Lisbon, Portugal
Simoes, J:
NOVA Univ Lisbon, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
Publ Hlth Unit ACES USP Almada Seixal, Almada, Portugal
Donato, H:
Ctr Hosp & Univ Coimbra, Documentat & Sci Informat Serv, Coimbra, Portugal
:
Miguel Hernandez Univ Elche, Hlth Psychol, Elche, Spain
Res Inst FISABIO, Alicante, Spain
:
Miguel Hernandez Univ Elche, Hlth Psychol, Elche, Spain
Res Inst FISABIO, Alicante, Spain
Salud Alicante St Joan Hlth Dist, Alicante, Spain
Sousa, P:
NOVA Univ Lisbon, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
CHRC, Comprehens Hlth Res Ctr, Lisbon, Portugal
NOVA Univ Lisbon, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, Lisbon, Portugal
Green Published, gold
|