Response to Monoclonal Antibodies in Asthma: Definitions, Potential Reasons for Failure, and Therapeutic Options for Suboptimal Response


Por: Pérez de Llano L, Cisneros C, Domínguez-Ortega J, Martínez-Moragón E, Olaguibel JM, Plaza V, Quirce S and Dávila I

Publicada: 1 ene 2023 Ahead of Print: 30 ago 2022
Resumen:
Real-life data reveal that more than half of severe asthma patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) do not achieve a complete response. Response to mAbs must be assessed holistically, considering all the clinically meaningful therapeutic goals, not only reduction of exacerbations and oral corticosteroids. There are 2 different ways of measuring the response to mAbs. One, qualitative, classifies patients according to the degree of disease control they have achieved, without explaining how much a given patient improves relative to the baseline (pre-mAb) clinical situation; the other, quantitative, scores the changes occurring after treatment. Both methods are complementary and essential to making clinical decisions on whether to continue treatment. The various potential causes of suboptimal response to mAbs include incorrect identification of the specific T2 pathways, comorbidities that reduce the room for improvement, insufficient dose, autoimmune phenomena, infections, change in the initial inflammatory endotype, and adverse events. Once a suboptimal response has been confirmed, a well-structured and multifaceted assessment of the potential causes of failure should be performed, with emphasis on the resulting inflammatory process of the airway after mAb therapy and the presence of chronic or recurrent infection. This investigation should guide the decision on the best therapeutic approach. The present review aims to help clinicians gain insights into how to measure response to mAbs and proceed in cases of suboptimal response.
ISSN: 10189068





JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Editorial
ESMON PUBLICIDAD S A, CALLE BALMES 209, 3 2, BARCELONA, 08006, SPAIN, España
Tipo de documento: Review
Volumen: 33 Número: 1
Páginas: 1-13
WOS Id: 001057859000001
ID de PubMed: 36040046
imagen gold

FULL TEXT

imagen Published Version
No Accesible

MÉTRICAS