A Web-Based Self-assessment Model for Evaluating Multidisciplinary Cancer Teams in Spain: Development and Validation Pilot Study


Por: Guilabert M, Prades J, Borras JM, Maestu I, Guerra JA, Fumadó L, Mira JJ and AEMAC Program Research Team

Publicada: 10 mar 2022 Ahead of Print: 10 mar 2022
Categoría: Health informatics

Resumen:
Background: Tumor boards constitute the main consensus and clinical decision-making body of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in cancer care. With the increasing clinical complexity of treatment options (eg, targeted therapies, multimodal treatments) and the progressive incorporation of new areas of intervention (eg, survivorship care), tumor boards are now required to play a central role in all cancer processes. However, although frameworks are in place to evaluate MDT quality, only few web-based tools are available for this purpose; indeed, no web-based MDT evaluation tools have been developed for or adapted to the Spanish National Health System. Objective: The first aim of this study was to develop a web-based self-assessment model (Autoevaluacion de Equipos Multidisciplinares de Atencion al Cancer [AEMAC]) for evaluating multidisciplinary cancer teams in Spain and the second aim was to validate this tool by testing its metric properties, acceptability, and usability. Methods: We designed and validated the AEMAC program in 3 stages. In the first stage (research), we reviewed the available scientific evidence and performed a qualitative case study of good practice in multidisciplinary care within the Spanish National Health System (n=4 centers and 28 health care professionals). The results were used to define the thematic areas and quality criteria for the self-evaluation model, which were then discussed and validated by a group of experts. The second stage (development) involved the technological development of a web app that would be accessible from any mobile device. In the third stage (piloting and validation), we conducted 4 pilot tests (n=15 tumor boards, 243 professionals) and used the results to analyze the acceptability and usefulness of the tool. Results: We designed a self-assessment model based on 5 thematic areas encompassing a total of 25 quality components, which users rated on a 3-option development scale. The evaluation process, which was managed entirely from the web app, consisted of individual self-assessment, group prioritization, and creation of an improvement plan. Cronbach alpha (.86), McDonald's omega (0.88), and various fit indices (comparative fit index between 0.95 and 1 and goodness-of-fit index between 0.97 and 0.99 for all 5 aspects) confirmed internal consistency. The mean rating for overall satisfaction with the tool and for consistency between the content of the tool and the reality of tumor boards was 7.6 out of 10. Conclusions: The results obtained during the period of research and piloting of the AEMAC program showed that it has an appropriate structure and metric properties and could therefore be implemented in a real context and generalized to other hospitals. As a virtual tool, it helps to measure the key aspects of MDT quality, such as effectiveness of collaboration and communication, leadership, and the organizational environment.

Filiaciones:
:
 Health Psychology Department, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain

Prades J:
 Department of Health, Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Barcelona, Spain

 Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain

Borras JM:
 Department of Health, Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Barcelona, Spain

 Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain

:
 Medical Oncology Service, Doctor Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

Guerra JA:
 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Fuenlabrada, Spain

Fumadó L:
 Urological Cancer Functional Unit, Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain

:
 Health Psychology Department, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain

 Atenea Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain

 Alicante-Sant Joan Health Department, Alicante, Spain

AEMAC Program Research Team:
 see Authors' Contributions,
ISSN: 14394456





JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Editorial
Journal of medical Internet Research, 59 WINNERS CIRCLE, TORONTO, ON M4L 3Y7, CANADA, Canada
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 24 Número: 3
Páginas:
WOS Id: 000789391700003
ID de PubMed: 35266870
imagen gold, Green Published

FULL TEXT

imagen Published Version CC BY v4.0

MÉTRICAS